I clicked onto the Newcastle University website
today to find a pair of rather malevolent eyes looking into mine. I was inclined to close the browser
immediately. Those eyes made me feel
distinctly uneasy. But I was interested
to see that they related to some research
carried out by Professor Melissa Bateson and Professor Daniel Nettle of the
Centre for Behaviour and Evolution at Newcastle, and Ken Nott of the
University’s security team. Bicycles are
regularly stolen from racks on the University campus, but by putting pictures
of eyes and short anti-theft messages above the racks the researchers found that
they could reduce the number of thefts by 62%. Unfortunately thefts from racks that were not
“guarded” by the disembodied eyes went up, suggesting that the thieves had
moved elsewhere, presumably to an area where they didn’t feel they were being
watched. What would have happened, I
wonder, if all racks had sported these off-putting glares? Perhaps the bicycle thieves would have overcome
their scruples and got out their bolt-cutters anyway. But the research is interesting, not only for
its potential effects on crime, but because it highlights our reactions to
eyes, and the wider importance they have for us as human beings. It surely can’t be coincidence that the
panda, with its eyes so clearly emphasised by black markings, is such a popular
image for conservation? Big-eyed creatures
such as bush babies are generally regarded as being particularly cute and owls,
with their clear, forward-looking gaze, also seem to strike a chord in a way
that other birds do not. Human babies
have eyes that are disproportionately large and we know that eye contact
between mother and baby seems to be important.
It promotes the attachment without which a baby may not survive. It seems then that being looked at can be
reassuring as well as threatening. So
why is that stare from above the cycle rack so threatening? Are the thieves perhaps worried that it might be
their mum who is watching when they steal that bike?
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Friday, 12 April 2013
Poetry, algebra and creativity
Does
anyone else still read the Liverpool poets?
The Mersey Sound collection was published by Penguin in 1967, and for
years afterwards it seemed as though everyone I knew possessed a copy. When I took “O” Level English in 1972, Adrian
Henri’s “In the Midnight Hour” even turned up as the unseen text. We were all thrilled by this at my school, as we didn't think people like teachers and examiners had ever heard of such radical writers. When, in that most intimate sign of commitment,
I shelved my book collection side by side with my partner’s, we realised we now
possessed two copies of The Mersey Sound.
We were married a year later. In
many respects the book seems stuck in a very specific era, but particular poems
from the collection still pop up regularly in my brain. Today I was thinking of Brian Patten’s “Prose
poem towards a definition of itself”. In
particular, the line: “On sighting mathematicians it should unhook algebra from
their minds and replace it with poetry; on sighting poets it should unhook poetry
from their minds and replace it with algebra” resonates. Interdisciplinarity hadn’t been
invented as a term, and would have seemed novel as an idea, when Patten wrote his poem, but this is a line to prompt that kind of
creative thinking. It also encapsulates a notion that I believe in absolutely: that being bounced out of our normal rut,
having our expectations circumvented can be peculiarly inspiring. I’m always pleased when colleagues ask me to
help them prepare presentations. I’m
easily flattered and it gives me a chance to proselytise. I rail against the ghastly powerpoint
presentation, urge them to surprise the audience with a poem when they are
expecting algebra, to illustrate a quatrain with quadratic equations. Why? Because, if they do, theirs will be the
presentation that the audience will remember, it will be an island in a sea of indistinguishable
bulletpoints. Persuading academics, or indeed
any professionals, to take this dangerous plunge is often difficult. They would rather be unmemorable than risk
looking foolish, particularly in front of their peers. Sadly, it’s a fear that most of us learn
early on. But sometimes risks really are
worth taking. The Liverpool poets came
in for some vicious sniping and criticism from the literary establishment, but
few would now deny that they were part of a hugely influential cultural wave
being surfed so spectacularly and creatively by The Beatles. And, unlike most poets, they sold an awful
lot of books: two are still sitting on the bookshelves in my house.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)