When the weather forecaster says that “there is a twenty
per cent chance of rain tomorrow” do you put on a mackintosh? Or do you assume that you’ll be ok without a
coat, because a twenty per cent chance seems pretty low? Many of us view the weather forecast with
scepticism but still complain vociferously when it seems as though the
forecaster has got it wrong. In fact
modern forecasts are remarkably accurate.
If conditions don’t measure up to our expectations it’s often because of
geographical variability or timing, factors that are difficult to forecast with
precision. But we also don’t seem to be
very good at understanding uncertainty.
We expect the forecast to be just that, a definite prediction of the
future. Of course, in reality, it can
only be modelled on what is happening at the moment. Poor Michael Fish will always be remembered
as the forecaster who denied that there was going to be a hurricane, even
though he did say that it was going to be windy. When serious damage, injury and even death ensue,
questions about “fault” emerge, of course.
We have seen that very clearly in Italy this week. Six scientists and a government official have
been found guilty of manslaughter and imprisoned because they failed to foresee
a major earthquake that struck the town of l’Aquila in 2009. This is very shocking to fellow scientists
who understand all too well how difficult it is to predict earthquakes with
accuracy. Such predictions always carry
a large margin of uncertainty. One
effect of the verdict is likely to be that researchers will be unwilling to
advise governments or to take part in public communications exercises in the
future. But were the scientists perhaps
to blame in the way they communicated? It
may be that at the public meeting where they talked about risk they did sound
too reassuring. Or, alternatively, was
the audience predisposed to hear the reassuring words, rather than the caveats
that the scientists insist were included?
Just as we would rather think that a twenty per cent chance of rain
means we don’t need a mackintosh after all.
But in reality it would probably be wise to pick up an umbrella, just in
case, and think ourselves lucky that we don't have to worry about earthquakes in the UK.
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment